"Spock" <Spo### [at] nospamcom> schreef in bericht
news:4262723e$1@news.povray.org...
> Zeger Knaepen wrote:
> > "Jaime Vives Piqueres" <jai### [at] ignoranciaorg> schreef in bericht
> > news:42616bb8@news.povray.org...
> >
> >>This is an old model I found while searching for interesting HDRI
> >>targets. I've enhanced some of the pieces with Wings3D, changed the
> >>trademark (sorry, it was irresistible... ;)
> >
> >
> > sweet!
> >
> > but, but!
> > shouldn't that be "AWSOME ROLEX" ? :)
> >
> >
>
> Maybe it depends on where you live.  Awesome is legit in some circles:
>
> http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?va=awesome
>
> http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?va=awsome

nono, I know the right way to spell it is "awesome", but "AWSOME ROLEX" is a
reference to someone who posted a Rolex-image, a few years ago, which he
said he modelled and rendered using POV-Ray but apparently he didn't model
it and it wasn't rendered with POV-Ray.  The subject of that post was
"AWSOME ROLEX".  So now, when they call something an "AWSOME ROLEX" they
mean it's too good to be true, too realistic to be made with POV-Ray.

Isn't that story part of the vfaq? :)

Post a reply to this message